|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Nickolay A.Kritsky (nkritsky
internethelp.ru)Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 10:12:22 CDT
Hello Jason,
Tuesday, July 17, 2001, 5:50:35 PM, you wrote:
JB> Thank you for your response. After playing around with ipfw, I discovered
JB> what the problem was:
JB> I was trying various combinations of pipes, and it seems if you do not
JB> delete your pipe (using ipfw pipe delete) before trying to recreate the
JB> pipe, the pipe seems to go unused.
Unused? I 'm afraid that I don't quite understand you... How does it affect
ipfw functionality?
JB> So, for example, when I update my firewall rules, I do an ipfw flush, and
JB> then dump in the new rules. Now, instead, I have to do an ipfw pipe
JB> delete, then an ipfw flush, and then dump in the new rules including the
JB> new pipe.
You know, I am the real ipfw newbie, but I am using pipes during about
5 months. I do ipfw flush quite often (I like to play with that tool
:)) , but never did "ipfw pipe delete", and never noticed nothing strange
in pipe behavior. Now I am quite confused? Are you sure, that doing
"ipfw flush" does not delete the pipes? May be FreeBSD guys should add
"ipfw pipe delete" line to standart /etc/rc.firewall, just before the
"ipfw flush"? IMHO this will save many newbies from confusion ;)
Good luck
JB> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org
JB> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
;-------------------------------------------
; NKritsky
; SysAdmin InternetHelp.Ru
; http://www.internethelp.ru
; mailto:nkritsky
internethelp.ru
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]