OK, let's not go through this yet one more time.. alright?

For most cases, anything less than SSH is asking for trouble.
There *are* some cases, though, when telnet is acceptable
(properly protected LAN's), and there are even some cases when telnet
is the only really acceptable way - and yes, I've heard about all kinds
of SSH clients, including Java ones, web-based ones, etc.. but still,
there are cases when one simply has to use telnet, period.

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
You have, of course, just begun reading the sentence that you have just finished reading.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 02:00:26PM +0200, Carroll, D. (Danny) wrote:
> Agreed
> As far as I am concerned, anything less than SSH is asking for trouble.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikhail Aronov [mailto:aronovparkline.ru]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:54 PM
> To: freebsd-securityFreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: Silly crackers... NT is for kids...
> 
> 
> On Aug 17, 2001, Roger Chien wrote:
> 
> >Don't you know that the effect of Code Red infected machine?
> >Most of them are innocent.
> >
> >BTW, your FreeBSD isn't absolutely secure, apply telnet-AYT patch
> >already?
> I was sure telnet died about 20 years ago together with passwordless
> logins etc. Uncrypted session == broadcast session, isn't it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]