OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Miguel Mendez (flynnenergyhq.homeip.net)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 08:53:34 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 08:06:09AM +0100, Raf Schietekat wrote:

    Hi Raf,

    I'm not sure if you just missed my point or you are trolling, but I'll bite
    :-)

    > Yeah, good idea, nuke all them Billysoft suckers and save the world!
    > Meanwhile, how about if I sent an innocent FreeBSD user an attack (this
    > looked like a Trojan horse, not an Outlook worm/virus (?), after my
    > forwarding cum "virus" filtering service released it to me)? Would s/he

    Well, you have a point here, as we all know: Security is a process, not
    a product. But you seem to forget one thing. FreeBSD is *not* by any
    means a mainstream OS. And that means that the people who use it usually
    know what they're doing, at least to the point of not executing a file
    they got from a stranger. Even if they did, all they could lose is the
    files they own, which, of course, should be backed up somewhere if they
    are worth anything. Considering the fact the 9 out of 10 computers run
    some MS OS, the probability that a clueless user is running BSD is
    almost 0.

    > be protected by what Java would call a sand box? I don't think so. Unix
    > security may be based more on marginality than on technical prowess, and
    > little if any progress seems to be being made. What good does it do to
    > me as an ordinary user that the superuser is safe and smug about his
    > continued service, if all my personal stuff goes down the drain?

    I see two cases where this could apply. Someone who just installed MacOS
    X and for some weird reason decided to play with permissions and the
    typical moron who joins a unix irc channel and says:"EYE HAEV INSTALLED
    TEH MANDRAEK!!!!". Well, not really, but you get the point. It is pretty
    safe to assume that those running BSD are worth their salt. I think Theo
    de Raadt once said it pretty nicely:"If you are too stupid to read
    documentation go and run Linux", it wasn't exactly those words, but that
    was the meaning. And no, I don't expect my mother to be a unix guru, but
    the freebsd-security list is a technical discussion forum, not the place
    for newbies.
    </rant>

    > Raf Schietekat <Raf_Schietekatieee.org>
    > Running Netscape 6.2 (because I still can) on MS Windows 2000
    > Professional on my laptop (because I have to).
                                  ^^^^^^^
    My deepest sympathies :-P

    Cheers,

    -- 
            Miguel Mendez - flynnenergyhq.homeip.net
            GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
            EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
            FreeBSD - The power to serve!
    

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

    iD8DBQE8cRVtnLctrNyFFPERAtrSAKCauDejlcT/c6PYxwbqcrWXW7q6zwCfd22k YpxZ5XgV9nRgNQaFFvirmu8= =w1YX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message