OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Nate Williams (nateyogotech.com)
Date: Thu Apr 18 2002 - 20:12:54 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    > > > FreeBSD currently does not enable easy maintainance between critical release
    > > > points for large server environments. Using cvsup to maintain source builds
    > > > for environments like these ( say 400 servers or more ) is not only
    > > > unacceptable without an on staff developer and release engineer, it is
    > > > infeasible.
    > > >
    > > > For those of you who would be quick to note that "Corporations with
    > > > 400 servers should be able to afford a developer and release engineer"
    > > > please note that 400 NT, Solaris, AIX, or HP-UX servers can be
    > > > maintained by a small team of administrators, and do not require these
    > > > extra resources.
    > >
    > > So, for 400 NT, Solaris, AIX, or HP-UX servers you allow a small team,
    > > and for FreeBSD you don't even allow a single engineer? Seems kind of a
    > > double standard.
    > >
    > > And as a long-time administrator, I disagree that FreeBSD is more
    > > difficult to maintain releases across systems. I've done Ultrix, SunOS,
    > > Solaris, FreeBSD, and (ack!) Linux, and I find that FreeBSD is second to
    > > Solaris, but barely so.
    > >
    > > However, Solaris doesn't even provide anything remotely close to what
    > > Brett is asking, and they're getting paid alot for the OS than FreeBSD
    > > is getting paid.
    > >
    > > Nate
    >
    > I think you misunderstood. I meant you don't need release engineers for
    > any of the above, only FreeBSD. FreeBSD might be great, but it doesn't admin
    > itself yet. ;) Consider 4 sysadmins, and 2 release engineers for FreeBSD, as
    > opposed to just 4 sysadmins for NT / Solaris / AIX / HP-UX.

    Call it what you like, but I consider preparing/testing a release for
    our configuration part of the 'sysadmin' job. Certainly the IS staff at
    my company does hardware/software verification as part of their job, on
    *all* platforms (including Win98/NT/Win2K/WinME/XP, along with all of
    the *nix variants).

    If it makes you feel better, use the title 'release engineer', but the
    staff of 4 people should be more than adequate to do all of the tasks
    necessary to support your installations, regardless of whether FreeBSD
    is used or not.

    Nate

    To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
    with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message