OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Ralph Huntington (rjhmohawk.net)
Date: Mon Jul 01 2002 - 15:16:50 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    Well, that all makes enough sense. Yes, I know about production machines.
    Got quite a few of them to be responsible for. And always have run RELEASE
    but thought to ask for clarification about STABLE. Thanks to all who
    replied. - Ralph

    On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:

    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Ralph Huntington" <rjhmohawk.net>
    > To: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdkdaleco.biz>
    > Cc: <freebsd-securityFreeBSD.ORG>
    > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:41 PM
    > Subject: Re: security fixes
    >
    > >Hmmm... I would think STABLE is what one sould
    > >want to run on a production
    > >machine. I'm beginning to feel confused again.
    >
    > As opposed to -CURRENT, yes. However,
    > the committers want everyone to realize that
    > once in a while you might build -STABLE with
    > something broken (albeit rare, as in the coincidence
    > of the "blue moon" and "hen's teeth" together...)
    > but it still could happen. -RELEASE is a -STABLE
    > that gets frozen for a while to see if any problems
    > pop up, or if it can be crowed about and burned
    > to CD with confidence (I hope the RELENG team
    > doesn't think I'm minimizing their hard work here.)
    >
    > Some people read the warning about -STABLE in
    > the Handbook (that I quoted earlier) and decide only
    > to run -RELEASE and patch security fixes, and
    > there is a cvs tag for this, called RELENG_4_x.
    > This is where a little confusion comes in, because
    > after a while they quit patching the older releases.
    > The official line is that it's the current release (4.6)
    > and the last (4.5) that are being patched, so if
    > you're still running 4.4-R, (for example) you're no
    > longer sure you can cvsup with RELENG_4_4
    > and get any new patches.
    >
    > As I said, -STABLE's running fine for me
    > right now and has everytime I've tried it.
    >
    > [If there's confusion on the term "production
    > machine," I take this to mean an active
    > www/mail/file server that you can't afford
    > to have downtime on....]
    >
    > KDK
    >
    >
    > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
    > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
    >

    To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
    with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message