|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Plamen Petkov (plamendp
bgstore.com)Date: Tue Jul 02 2002 - 04:14:30 CDT
Hi,
Since 2-3 years I don't have any problems cvsuping only *-STABLE. It's a
matter of trust in core team, all commiters, etc. that -STABLE is
*realy* stable :-) So, I always cvsup -STABLE (RELENG_4 at the moment)
and everything is OK. Of course, I first cvsup at dev machine and test
if it's Ok then cvsup on production machine(s). Just to be sure there is
nothing wrong with cvsup server I use.
Regards,
--- Plamen D. Petkov, ICQ# 2214327 plamendpbgstore.com http://www.bgstore.com
> > With all the traffic surrounding these recent vulnerabilities, it's a > > little confusing to know what one has to do and need not do. Let me ask > > this one question, please: > > > > In cvsup'ing the patched sources, if I have a 4.6-RELEASE box, should I > > cvsup RELENG_4_6 and for the earlier 4.x machines cvsup RELENG_4 ???
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]