|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Anatole Shaw (shaw_at_autoloop.com)
Date: Tue Aug 06 2002 - 13:03:00 CDT
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 12:08:36PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> What do you propose?
I think that a policy of issuing "early warning" advisories, as Colin
Percival extrapolated from my original post, is one right solution. That
is, an incomplete advisory is better than no advisory at all, when bug
details (i.e. patch) are already circulating.
Some other OS vendors issue advisories that say little more than "hurry up
and download the patch," but at least those make admins aware that an
issue exists. I'd be happy to help make a (better, obviously) "early
warning system" happen for FreeBSD, if people agree that it's a good idea.
We're all on the same boat here.
Regards,
-- Anatole Shaw Autoloop Security Consulting http://www.autoloop.comTo Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo
FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message