OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Brett Glass (brett_at_lariat.org)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 17:08:46 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    At 03:32 PM 10/1/2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:

    >Discussions of licensing and reimplementation of GNU utilities are
    >off-topic for security. However, I encourage you to continue this
    >discussion in another forum. For example, NetBSD's pax(1) code has a
    >half-implemented GNU tar compatibility mode which could be extended to
    >cover most of the common GNU tar options.

    Yes, it does have most of the features of GNU tar. About the only thing
    it's missing is bzip2 capability, which is easy to add. Complete code
    to translate the command line options would be dull work but not
    technically challenging at all. (It could even be done by a Perl
    front end, though it'd be better to reduce it to C.)

    In the meantime, though, is there a chance that a fix for the vulnerability
    can be slipped into 4.7 prior to release? I'd hate to be exploding a
    tarball, as root, and discover that it had upreferenced to the top of
    the directory tree and installed something nasty. (If such an
    exploit were to hit /etc/crontab, it could run arbitrary code in a
    minute or less -- probably before the admin could react.)

    --Brett

    To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomoFreeBSD.org
    with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message