OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
aliver_at_xexil.com
Date: Fri Aug 16 2002 - 17:01:45 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Matthew Murphy wrote:
    > Wasn't intending to group you and them together in any way, just to
    > point out how ridiculous their motivations are.

    As far as I can tell it's unclear if it's one or many individuals, and due
    to this fact it'd be premature to conclude you understand their
    motivations. This doesn't seem to keep you from assuming you understand
    their motivations.

    > WHY? Their entire view makes absolutely no sense -- they propose to say
    > that stopping the flow of information will somehow help the problem?

    I can't speak for all hackers or blackhats, it's a diverse group with a
    lot of different skill levels and backgrounds. However, I for one don't
    propose to "stop the flow of information". However, I do propose that
    corporations don't get the benefit of free "vulnerability research" from
    blackhats who are their open-enemies. Now speaking for myself, I can say
    that I'll be sure that my personal tools, scripts, and libraries don't
    easily find their ways into the hands of those who I despise. If they do
    eventually end up on the laptop of a whitehat, then hopefully it'll be too
    late to do much with the information or code.

    > <rant> By stopping the flow of information, they are simply leaving
    > people less secure, and this is how they propose to fix the problem of
    > poorly secured products?

    Who ever suggested that they (or any blackhats) were trying to fix this
    problem? Corporate greed is the enemy in my mind, and poor security is a
    side effect.

    > Their view seems to be "Withhold information from the un-informed so
    > that they cannot act".

    You've got the wrong impression, IMO. The view is "keep your work out of
    the hands of the people you hate and will take advantage of you to make
    money, even though they hate you too."

    > This just further shows the character of our friends at "phrack" --
    > selfish, childish, irrational loner wannabes. </rant>

    I don't know the #phrack guys. I don't really think sending porn pics to
    the list will achieve their goals, but since I understand the concept of
    mail filtering it doesn't really make a difference to me. However,
    slapping labels on groups of people whom you have little knowledge or
    experience doesn't really garner my respect, either.

    aliver

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html