On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:17:21PM +0100, John Cartwright wrote:
> After seeing much debate on the subject, we've decided to resolve this
> issue in a democratic manner. Please vote at the below URL for your
> reply-to preference: should it be to the poster, or the list, by
> default.
>
> http://www.netalarms.com/story/2002/8/28/1462/54551
>
> We'll make changes (if necessary) once the closing date has been reached
> (the 31st of this month).

How about leaving it as the poster specifies? It took me long enough to
remove the "[Full-Disclosure]" BS from the subject lines. I'd rather not
have to find a way to un-mangle the Reply-To: header as well.

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

-Dan

-- 
"Burnished gallows set with red
 Caress the fevered, empty mind
 Of man who hangs bloodied and blind
 To reach for wisdom, not for bread."  -- Deoridhe Grimsdaughter
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]