OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
silvio_at_big.net.au
Date: Wed Oct 02 2002 - 04:54:37 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 03:45:13AM -0500, sockz loves you wrote:
    > > Terrorist
    > > = those without the resources to wage conventional warfare against a superior enemy.
    >
    > a terrorist is just someone who employs terroris,. terrorism being a military tactic of sorts, usually employing non-conventional tactics, and stuff. a terrorist can be someone who works for Kahane Chai, or someone who was trained in terrorism by the CIA.
    >
    > its just a tactic. nothing more. it isn't the basis for a person's character, and certainly isn't the basis for that terrorist to be demonised, stereotyped, and ridiculed. in my mind, richard's article was on par with freud's work on homosexuality. translation: lame.
    >
    > and thats all i plan to say on the matter
    >
    > <3 sockz

    I suggest the word terrorist be removed from conversation, and be replaced
    with the more lengthy "using non conventional warfare" or whatever
    appropriate. It makes conversations about seemingly tangible terminology,
    much more tangible when spoken with tangible quantities.

    I am still yet to understand what a terrorist in modern usage really is. If I
    did think I understood what it meant, then I would have arrested my neighbours
    since they were commie sympathizers, and everyone knows how them commies and
    terrorists stick together.

    At least with anti-communist propaganda, the entire basis of bullshit was
    around some political ideology which spiralled into name calling. Not to say
    that communism is great.. but has any modern society seen a communist
    ideology as stated for communism, actually implemented? the soviet union,
    was a socialist state iirc, and not communist in the marxist sense. Do they
    still teach that at school? Marx was a full-flight communist believer, and
    viewed that communism was the destinity of social ideologies. Naturally, there
    are many other books to say what marx did not accurately predict. But thats
    one of the arguments against sociology as a science isn't it? Also why
    pyschiatry is seen as a science these days (though many would call it a soft
    science). But stick a large enough population in a room, and then start
    telling them to zap people with electricty..

    better yet. give half 20 bucks, and the other half 1 buck as payment to reply
    to these posts.

    --
    Silvio
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html