|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Strategic Reconnaissance Team (recon_at_snosoft.com)
Date: Wed Jan 29 2003 - 13:29:05 CST
We are considering nessus as an option. When we make our final decision
I will make it a point to send a notification message to full
disclosure.
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:48, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> Personally don't care whether you release exploits or not.
>
> But will you use nessus and such?
> Because someone filled the nessus db imho.
>
> Georgi Guninski
> http://www.guninski.com
>
> Strategic Reconnaissance Team wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I have been following the subject of full disclosure for a while, and as
> > most of you know, have dealt with some of the issues that full
> > disclosure can cause (HP/Secure Network Operations/DMCA). While the
> > idea of full disclosure is a good idea, and while we support it, we feel
> > that the exploit source code should not be released to everyone.
> >
> > It is possible to prove a vulnerability exists by releasing well written
> > advisories. Because of this fact, proof of concept code (exploit
> > source) is not a requirement for the education of the possibly
> > vulnerable. Releasing non-malicious exploit code is also not an option
> > as any local script bunny/kiddie can easily render it functional.
> >
> > Proof of concept code is useful for legitimate contract based
> > penetration tests. It is also useful for study as it demonstrates
> > fundamental flaws computers today (not built in security). But again,
> > proof of concept code is not for everyone.
> >
> > I am interested in hearing the opinions of the people on this list. If
> > you are for exploit source disclosure, I would like to hear arguments
> > supported by facts, that explain why. I am equally interested in
> > reasons why not to disclose information.
> >
> > With that said, Secure Network Operations, Inc. will no longer be
> > releasing functional proof of concept code. We may release sufficiently
> > detailed advisories.
> >
> >
-- Strategic Reconnaissance Team <reconsnosoft.com> Secure Network Operations, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQA+OCuANpS+GkWHNygRApV+AJ4/1DvxApyD6i3uVpiFiGqhTxdZ9gCfQ67r ki8vWgjb/lP8J39UWrqfzaE= =h2L4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
snosoft.com>
Secure Network Operations, Inc.