Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
[Full-Disclosure] Email legislation does not exist
From: Thor Larholm (thorpivx.com)
Date: Thu Mar 04 2004 - 13:10:36 CST
> From: Mike Barushok [mailto:mikehomekcisp.net]
> Cc: full-disclosurelists.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky
> Then there is the 'rejection' problem. If the mail is
> not accepted, laws prohibit silently discarding it.
I don't mean to be rude, but what laws are you referring to?
The internet is a collection of private networks running on private
property. What law dictates that I am forced to accept any email, or any
single packet of any kind, on my machine?
It's an old saying, but it rings true: My network, my machine, my rules.
Though perhaps a bit simply put, Doc Searls and David Weinberger
highlights this same issue on http://www.worldofends.com/.
Do we really want email to be legislated as regular postal services are?
If so, should we not then be prohibited to run non-approved email
Doesn't the concept of email legislation itself oppose the basic
structure of the Internet, by imposing legislation on private property?
We legislate other private property such as guns based on their inherent
danger, should we assume that machines connected to the Internet are by
definition insecure and regulate them?
(I have CC'ed the SecLegal mailing list)
Senior Security Researcher
24 Corporate Plaza #180
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: +1 (949) 231-8496
6BB1 B77F CB62 0D3D 5A82 C65D E1A4 157C 5A27 6569
PivX defines "Proactive Threat Mitigation". Get a FREE Beta Version of
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.