|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
From: Full-Disclosure (fd
weevers.net)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 02:17:08 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> "Geo." <geoincidentsgetinfo.org> wrote:
>
> > ... Even the stupid check tools assume you have the thing
> on the net
> > before it's patched.
>
> Yep, yet there are still MS apologists who refuse to open
> their eyes so
> as to understand that "Microsoft still shows little hint that
> it 'gets'
> security".
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick FitzGerald
In an corporate environment, you will have SUS or SMS running.
If so, no need for internet access.
If you don't have this, just place a firewall on the box, or before the
box.
How hard can this be ? You do it the same way, as you would do before
you
would patch debian/*bsd/gentoo/ect/ect/ect.
There is no real problem here. Don't blame microsoft if you can't come
up with solutions to simple security "problems".
Niek
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]