|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: [Full-Disclosure] M$ - so what should they do?
From: Ciro Spider-Man (geekciro
gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 24 2004 - 04:12:41 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:04:37 +1200, Stuart Fox (DSL AK)
<stuartf
datacom.co.nz> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > How about changing the ".exe" convention? Making a file
> > executable by it's "extension" probably causes a lot of
> > opportunities for problems, doesn't it?
> >
> > Also, the magic file names, like "CON" and "AUX" should go away.
> >
>
> No way! Am I the only person who still uses "copy con filename.txt" to
> create scripts and such at the command line? Please tell me I'm not?
>
I don't use it to create scripts, but I do use it. Frequently use the
filehandles on unix boxen, too, for that matter. Who needs a
fullscreen editor? ;)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]