|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
From: Cyril Guibourg (plonk-o-matic
teaser.fr)
Date: Wed Jun 30 2004 - 13:17:36 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <HOtero
lanchile.cl> writes:
> I think you do, because at least a nat 0 itīs needed to get traffic passing
> through the pix.
This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]