Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email email@example.com
Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
From: Cyril Guibourg (plonk-o-maticteaser.fr)
Date: Wed Jun 30 2004 - 13:17:36 CDT
"Otero, Hernan (EDS)" <HOterolanchile.cl> writes:
> I think you do, because at least a nat 0 itīs needed to get traffic passing
> through the pix.
This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.