|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
RE: [Full-Disclosure] Presidential Candidates' Websites Vulnerable
From: Grant Thibdea (shiptar
blazemail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 12:41:37 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If we're getting into a discussion of vulns/security issues with the e-voting, ok. The draft is off topic. But because people feel the need to intimidate and lie to our nations youth (this would be me) I wanted to correct this FUD, as it's called.
http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:S.89:
http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:HR00163:
The last action on the draft bill was 6/21/2004. (for those that don't feel like looking) That's pretty recent! It was Rep Norton, Eleanor Holmes [DC] withdrawing support for the bill. The last action before that seems to be.... the introduction of the bill. It's been sitting in committee otherwise.
Please mail me off list to continue a draft discussion, to share any more sources of information or to trash me.
My apologies for wasting others bandwidth/time for such a thing. I will not do so again.
--- "Clairmont, Jan M" <jan.m.clairmont
citigroup.com> wrote:
Harlan:
http://www.rense.com/general52/fgult.htm
A link to the article about the passed but yet unsigned draft bill.
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2004/06/26/election2004/21_17_566_25_04.txt
We may not have election if a terrorist attack occurs.
Problems with electronic voting; FYI
http://www.rense.com/general42/dieboldmachinesyield.htm
Jan Clairmont
Firewall Administrator/Consultant
-----Original Message-----
From: Harlan Carvey [mailto:keydet89
yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:26 AM
To: full-disclosure
lists.netsys.com
Cc: Clairmont, Jan M
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Presidential Candidates' Websites
Vulnerable
Jan,
> If any issue is more important than electronic
> voting I don't
> know what it is. Congress has approved starting in
> the Spring
> of 2005, the draft, all the way up to 49 years of
> age for special skills.
I'm not clear as to what one issue has to do with the
other. Those in Congress have already been elected,
so what does electronic voting issues have to do with
the military draft.
Also, could you provide a link to information stating
that Congress will be instituting the draft? I'm
familiar with the news reports about involuntary
call-ups of IRR troops, but all I've been able to
locate on the draft (different issue entirely) seems
to say that this isn't something to worry about:
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/9049861.htm
http://www.iht.com/articles/527445.html
So...anything you have that's more definitive would be
greatly appreciated.
> So we here are now in the fire, both security wise
> and on the
> firing line in Iraq and the rest of the world as
> this war continues to rage.
To which "war" are you referring?
> Since I have 3 sons of draftable age, I am very
> concerned about
> them and the under 49 crowd who may soon be in harms
> way.
> Having gone through Vietnam I do not look forward to
> the
> future, whether you think war is right of wrong. So
> how can
> we secure the integrity of the voting process and
> guarantee the results?
Again, maybe it's just me, but I'm not seeing the
connection between the supposed draft and the voting
process...
Thanks,
Harlan
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_____________________________________________________________
Fight the power! BlazeMail.com
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]