Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Comparison of Network Security Scanners
From: Christopher Blume (godsmokegodsmoke.com)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 15:55:21 CDT
Exactly -- how can we trust a test where the company that conducted it,
and therefor designed the test is the product that won. Now, of the
vendor tests I've seen conducted by a competitor, this one seemed pretty
honest (Nessus scored very high). However, they didn't test Retina 5 --
which from what I hear is supposed to be a very big improvement. When I
get ahold of it, I'd be happy to run some tests against Nessus.
Anders B Jansson wrote:
> And to everyones surprise their own product came out on top!
> Wow, it has to be good, film at 11
> // anders
> Alexander wrote:
>> Hi all!
>> Comparison of Network Security Scanners:
>> In this survey the following products were tested:
>> 1 IS - Internet Scanner 7.0 Internet Security Systems
>> 2 LG - LanGuard 3.2 GFI
>> 3 Ns - Nessus 2.0.6 Renaud Deraison<
>> 4 NR - NetRecon 3.6 Symantec
>> 5 Rt - Retina 4.9.97 eEye Digital Security
>> 6 MP - MaxPatrol 7.0 Positive Technologies
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.