Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Re: [Full-Disclosure] Web sites compromised by IIS attack
From: Barry Fitzgerald (bkfsecsdf.lonestar.org)
Date: Tue Jul 06 2004 - 08:33:51 CDT
>On Friday 02 July 2004 23:33, Barry Fitzgerald wrote:
>>No, I'm not wrong.
>>The discussion is about who's responsible for support of said software.
>>There's no obligation through the GNU GPL that support is required if
>>money changes hands, however the point of the discussion is who's
>>responsible for support of said software in a situation where the
>>software produced is broken and supported.
>>Red Hat sells support. The act of taking binaries and actively and
>>intentionally redistributing them is a support service.
>Well that is open to debate. If I just download Redhat, they make no money
>off me. Do they still have to fix my software then ? Are they responsible ?
Nope - it's the act of exchanging money for the support contract that
makes the obligated to provide said support.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.