Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
Re: [Full-disclosure] Benign Worms
Date: Fri May 13 2005 - 11:44:21 CDT
On Fri, 13 May 2005 11:13:03 CDT, k k said:
(Yes, even the best of us hit 'send' too soon sometimes ;)
> There is debate surrounding whether releasing benign worms such as Nachi or
> Welcha, in general is ethical or not.
Oh? Who has lined up on the "it's a good idea" side of the room?
I suspect that "There is debate" means either:
1) The same sort of people who are still debating if the world is round or flat.
2) Ass-wipe academics who probably have never even *tried* to patch their
own systems, but feel qualified to talk about doing it to other people without
their prior informed consent. Given that most academics agree that "prior
informed consent" is a Good Thing, it will be a true ass-wipe (even for an academic)
who thinks doing it without consent is a wise idea.
3) Somebody thinks that somebody else saying "Yeah, it would be a good idea, except
this long list of reasons its's bad" indicates a debate.
Yes, there's quite likely overlap between the groups.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/