Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email email@example.com
[Full-disclosure] Re: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind
From: Valdis Shkesters (valdisantivirus.lv)
Date: Fri Oct 28 2005 - 08:10:36 CDT
Maybe better to call the things their names and not to create havoc?
Let's there be adware, Trojan horses, backdoors, viruses, etc.
Hullabaloo with so called spyware has brought us up to such a state,
that on September 29th PC World wrote "While adware can be a major
annoyance, spyware can be very dangerous, so we focused on the latter type
can tell where exactly spyware begins and where ends?
Maybe antivirus products should detect all dangerous and potentially
dangerous programs, leaving the choice which objects to exclude from
scanning to users?
Anti-spyware by definition are products which protect users against
something undefined. And the results are to be seen. This is the report from
infected computer, scanned Kaspersky Anti-Virus:
Only actively dangerous programs are listed. The computer was "protected" by
Spybot - Search & Destroy and Microsoft AntiSpyware. As I summarize reports
on infected computers every month, there are many such an examples saved up.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Quark IT - Hilton Travis" <Hiltonquarkit.com.au>
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 11:50 PM
Subject: Microsoft AntiSpyware falling further behind
It seems that not only does Microsoft AntiSpyware recommend that
Claria's spyware is ignored, but it also misses a significant amount of
cookies that are placed on a system - I have a VPC environment where I
browse the Internet so that anywhere I go won't affect my regular
Windows session/installation. Regularly CounterSpy is detecting cookies
(such as Cok.ad.yieldmanager, CGI-Bin, Cok.AssassinTrojan2.0 and Zedo
(from yesterday's browsing)) that Microsoft AntiSpyware simply does not
Now, this is not only disappointing, but potentially dangerous. Any
customer or end user running Microsoft AntiSpyware or CounterSpy is not
being protected from these cookies, and MSAS doesn't even detect them -
that's right, neither program's active monitoring is stopping the
installation of these cookies, but at least CounterSpy is detecting them
AntiSpyware is far, far from the accuracy of antivirus, especially
something like NOD32. I wonder how long it will be before a decent
AntiSpyware application is released that, like NOD32 does with viruses,
actually stops spyware *before* it is installed?
Hilton Travis Phone: +61 (0)7 3344 3889
(Brisbane, Australia) Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394
Manager, Quark IT http://www.quarkit.com.au
Quark Group http://quarkgroup.com.au/
Microsoft Small Business Specialists
http://www.threatcode.com/ <-- its now time to shame poor coders
into writing code that is acceptable for use on today's networks
War doesn't determine who is right. War determines who is left.
This document and any attachments are for the intended recipient
only. It may contain confidential, privileged or copyright
material which must not be disclosed or distributed.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/