|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: [Full-disclosure] complaints about the governemnt spying!
From: bkfsec (bkfsec
sdf.lonestar.org)
Date: Thu Dec 29 2005 - 13:14:00 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Valdis.Kletnieksvt.edu wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:04:43 CST, Leif Ericksen said:
>
>
>>There are those laws that are direct and clear cut, and there are the
>>ones that takes an act of congress to decide what is legal or not. ;)
>>
>>
>
>And then there are those you're not allowed to even *see*. In Gilmore v. Ashcroft,
>the Department of Justice finally consented to allow a *judge* with a security
>clearance to see the text of the law, but Gilmore and his attorneys are still
>denied access to what the law says.
>
>
Which begs the question... How do you break a law that you don't know
exists?
How can one be expected not to break the law if the law is never made
available?
-bkfsec
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]