From: J. Oquendo (silinfiltrated.net)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2007 - 14:24:08 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Casper.DikSun.COM wrote:

> But a "0 day vulnerability" is meaningless as a definition; it applies to
> a vulnerability for exactly 24 hours and then is meaningless. ALL
> vulnerabilities were discovered at some point and had their 24 hours of
> "0 day fame" by your definition. It just does not make sense.
>
> Casper
>

Should we now create a new term for the industry +0day or 1day. How
about? nowaday

--
====================================================
J. Oquendo
"Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta"

http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E
sil . infiltrated net http://www.infiltrated.net

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

• application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]