From: Peter Besenbruch (prblava.net)
Date: Thu Jan 31 2008 - 10:39:32 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wednesday 30 January 2008 08:32:36 scott wrote:
> Yes and MS quietly extended 98 for a few more years until they came out
> with 2000.A much better OS than ME at the time,IMHO.

While Windows 98 SE was the best of the 9x series, I don't think anyone really
mourned its passing (I still use it under Qemu). XP would have been hands
down a better system except for its obnoxious copy protection. Even so, the
stability advantages XP yielded made it a better system.

Windows 2000 and ME were released the same year (2000 first, if I remember).
2000 was seen as an update to NT4, not 98. 2000 was the first NT OS to
include plug and play, but the conversion from 98 to 2000 required a full
reinstall. XP let you upgrade your Windows 9x system directly, although that
was probably not a good idea.

If there is a "best" Windows candidate, I would vote for Windows 2000. It was
relatively light weight, stable, and it offered minimal copy protection.
--
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]