Valdis.Kletnieksvt.edu
Date: Mon Apr 21 2008 - 11:57:12 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:04:41 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
> I think you are mistaken. Perhaps you have an outdated version of
> the document in question?

No, it is you that is sadly mistaken.

IETF RFCs are not versioned. If substantial changes are made, the
document is re-issued with a new number. And you'd know that if you
had actually spent any significant time reading RFCs.

Hint: When arguing about the contents of an RFC, it's usually advisable
to actually have found and read said RFC before opening your mouth in order
to insert your foot.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFIDMdocC3lWbTT17ARAjeOAKDJKfZa4hnGYw7/xEhC51hO8jgZtACgh8JA
/d0UXlCfuJTpyTzS6S7SEdA=
=DEl3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]