|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Ureleet (ureleet
gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 03 2009 - 08:48:48 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
y not have ur os secure in the first place and designed with full
permissions instead of bothering the user. look at linux, look at
unix. theyve been doing it 4 years.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Christopher Pritchard
<mailinglist
brainiacghost.co.uk> wrote:
>> The biggest issue here is that although it's technically easy to fix
>> this problem (just have UAC issue an alert when somebody's messing with
>> the system settings), it involves doing more of what end users dislike
>> most about UAC (it issuing alerts to Joe Sixpack all the time when he
>> does something bone-headed security-wise).
>>
>> Fixing this one in a way that users will put up with will be a bitch.
>
> Why not just have it not prompt if you are changing settings, except for UAC settings? that would be the simple way around it
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]