|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-disclosure Anti virus installations on Windows servers
Let me clarify my question.
First, I do not own the server in question. I did not install the operating system in question. I did not make that business decision.
According to http://news.netcraft.com/
Thirty percent of servers run windows.
Some of you will laugh at someone who has to protect a windows server, and would suggest rebuilding from the ground up. Obviously my client would disagree.
One person suggested Kaspersky, and I have it running at the moment, it seems to be working as intended.
Am I missing the point?
T Biehn wrote:
From: mbs (mbs
mistrealm.com)
Date: Mon May 04 2009 - 08:15:23 CDT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Let me clarify my question.
First, I do not own the server in question. I did not install the operating system in question. I did not make that business decision.
According to http://news.netcraft.com/
| Apache | 104,178,852 | 46.35% | 106,368,727 | 45.95% | -0.41 |
| Microsoft | 66,229,250 | 29.47% | 67,767,928 | 29.27% | -0.20 |
Thirty percent of servers run windows.
Some of you will laugh at someone who has to protect a windows server, and would suggest rebuilding from the ground up. Obviously my client would disagree.
One person suggested Kaspersky, and I have it running at the moment, it seems to be working as intended.
Am I missing the point?
T Biehn wrote:
The example provides an easy to concoct scenario where perhaps anti-virus software might be employed to great benefit where the
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]