Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
From: Guido Landi (listskeamera.org)
Date: Wed Sep 02 2009 - 03:33:47 CDT
no, MKDIR is *not* required, also write access is *not* required.
Assuming a directory with a name that starts with "A" exists and that is
at least 14 chars long, this pattern will trigger the overflow:
At least on win2k3. Therefore, the workarounds for kb975191 on
microsoft.com are wrong.
Vladimir '3APA3A' Dubrovin wrote:
> Dear Thierry Zoller,
> I think yes, MKDIR is required. It should be variation of
> S99-003/MS02-018. fuzzer should be very smart to create directory and
> user both oversized buffer and ../ in NLST - it makes path longer than
> MAX_PATH with existing directory.
> --Monday, August 31, 2009, 8:21:12 PM, you wrote to full-disclosurelists.grok.org.uk:
> TZ> Confirmed.
> TZ> Ask yourselves why your fuzzers haven't found that one - Combination of
> TZ> MKDIR are required before reaching vuln code ?
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/