OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
Re: [Full-disclosure] Brilliant attack "bypasses" bitlocker

From: Thor (Hammer of God) (thorhammerofgod.com)
Date: Fri Dec 11 2009 - 16:26:09 CST

/me sheepishly acquiesces to Dan publically.

Dan is right, I am wrong. After consulting our resident grammar expert, I have been corrected. My apologies to Dan for incorrectly attributing a grammatical error to his piece. I was going to bet on it too ;)

t

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Goodin [mailto:dgoodinsitpub.com]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 2:21 PM
To: Thor (Hammer of God)
Subject: Re: Brilliant attack "bypasses" bitlocker

"Methods" is an object in the sentence. I think what's confusing you is
that it comes ahead of the subject, which is "attack."

Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
> Sorry, you're wrong on this one. Only if your structure was "The hardware-level phishing attack" as the object and not "methods" would you be correct. But it's not.... The methods "are," not the methods "is." You might have intended that to be the case, but you didn't write it like that.
>
> t

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/