From: naif (listsinfosecurity.ch)
Date: Sun Jan 31 2010 - 17:41:21 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ok, now we have the evidence: The research was a fake security
research arranged for a marketing campaign.

They was able cheat most journalists, bloggers and security magazines.

I don't remember in all my life a so irresponsible and dirty marketing
trick in the security world, abusing of hackers reputations.

Read below, they leaked the IP of the anonymous author of http://infosecurityguard.com
  and it's confirmed that it come from SecurStar GmbH office:

Evidence that infosecurityguard.com/notrax is SecurStar GmbH – A fake
independent research on voice crypto (by me)
Dishonest security: The SecurStart GmbH case (by me)
Debunking Infosecurityguard identity from Matteo Flora .

It's hilarious and unbelievable that a security company had done
something like this.

Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)

On 30/gen/10, at 15:51, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> i don't know how many of you have read about the analysis done on http://infosecurityguard.com
> .
>
> I have made a detailed analysis of their initiative and the result
> is that:
>
> - it's most probably a camouflage marketing initiative and not a
> independent security research
> - they consider a security context where local device has been
> compromised (no software can be secured in that case)
> - they do not consider cryptographic security arguments
>
> Below my analysis on this (read it carefully):
>
> http://infosecurity.ch
>
> Maybe it's interesting, maybe not, but for sure some facts are very
> relevant!
>
> Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]