Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email firstname.lastname@example.org
From: Mike Hale (eyeronic.designgmail.com)
Date: Tue May 04 2010 - 10:48:14 CDT
Looks like he rewrote it and clarified what he meant to say.
I think this is a lesson on why you really should proofread stuff and
ask someone else to go over your writings before you publish
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sec News <secnewzgmail.com> wrote:
> Did anyone else see this?
> Penetration Tools Can Be Weapons in the Wrong Hands
> Author: Morey Haber Date: May 3rd, 2010 Categories: Network Security,
> Vulnerability Management
> After a lifetime in the vulnerability assessment field, Iíve come to look at
> penetration testing almost as a kind of crime, or at least a misdemeanor.
> We enjoy freedom of speech, even if it breaks the law or license agreements.
> Websites cover techniques for jailbreaking iPhones even though it clearly
> violates the EULA for Apples devices. Penetration tools clearly allow the
> breaking and entering of systems to prove that vulnerabilities are real, but
> clearly could be used maliciously to break the law.
> Making these tools readily available is like encouraging people to play with
> fireworks. Too bold of a statement? I think not. Fireworks can make a
> spectacular show, but they can also be abused and cause serious damage. In
> most states, only people licensed and trained are permitted to set off
> Now consider a pen test tool. In its open form, on the Internet, everyone
> and anyone can use it to test their systems, but in the wrong hands, for
> free, it can be used to break into systems and cause disruption, steal
> information, or cause even more permanent types of harm.
> How many people remember the 80ís TV show Max Headroom? Next to murder, the
> most severe crime was if users illegally used information technology systems
> to steal information or make money. There was tons of security around these
> systems and even possession of tools to penetrate a system was a crime too.
> So whatís the difference?
> Yes, it is just a TV show but in reality today we are in effect putting
> weapons in peopleís hands, not tracking them, and allowing them to use them
> near anonymously to perform crimes or learn how to perform more
> sophisticated attacks. It all comes back to the first amendment and Freedom
> of Speech. I can write a blog of this nature, state my opinion about how I
> feel about free penetration testing tools, and assure everyone that they
> need defenses to protect their systems, since free weapons are available
> that can break into your systems Ė easily.
> WOW - am i the only one to go WTF to this? †Talk about alienating your
> customers and shitting where you eat.
> And to think i used to be a fan...
> - Some anonymous ex-eEye fan
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/