|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Re: IDS: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers
Wagner Brett (wagner_brett
bah.com)
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 15:00:37 -0400
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- Next message: Martin Roesch: "Re: IDS: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers"
- Previous message: Brotschi, Brian: "IDS: RE: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers"
- Next in thread: Martin Roesch: "Re: IDS: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers"
- Reply: Martin Roesch: "Re: IDS: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers"
FAQ: See http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html
IDS: See http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html
HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner
uow.edu.au
NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce.
SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list.
USUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo
uow.edu.au
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- All,I am not a "Honey Pot" expert however, I worked for Internetworking and their product GTE Sentinel was able to do this per the developers. I know a little about this particular product and it seemed like a good choice. I do not work there any longer so I do not think I am biased. On another note can security professionals accomplish the same thing with deception tool kit and some other free tools?
Cheers Brett
"Martins, Fernando (Lisbon)" wrote: > > FAQ: See http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html > IDS: See http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html > HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owner
uow.edu.au > NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce. > SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list. > USUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomo
uow.edu.au > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Hi2all > > I'm reading some info on Cybercop too, but not enough to jump to a valid conclusion, like .... "i can dump that" > > But ... lets brainstorming a little ... > > Thinking about the networks and subnetworks that the honeypot can have ... if i start to ping and trace IPs there, is there any simulation of delays between hosts? ramdom? fixed? if a standard in found ... thats a honeypot, because in real enviroment pings and traces can gives us similar delays, but not allways the same ... > Comments, tips, flames? =;o) > > Thinking in OS fingerprint ... (anyone can continue, because i cant ... eheh) > > Kind Regards, > Fernando Martins > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jon Speer [SMTP:speer
tripwiresecurity.com] > > Sent: Ter> ça-feira, 24 de Agosto de 1999 21:39 > > To: ids
uow.edu.au > > Subject: IDS: Honey pots / decoy servers > > > > Honeypots and decoy servers have been around for years, and at one time or another many of us have experimented with the Deception ToolKit or similar technologies. I am now seeing plenty of press coverage for products like Recourse ManHunt and Network Associates Cybercop Sting, generally associated with collecting forensics evidence. > > > > My question is.. do they really work very well? It seems to me that it couldn't be that hard to learn enough characteristics of behavior of each of these to detect when you encounter one, and that it wouldn't be all that effective at getting more info than your last jump point. Has anyone actually gathered admissible evidence from this kind of technology? > > > > Thanks, > > Jon Speer > > Tripwire > > > > ** My thoughts here are not representative of my employers ** > >
- Next message: Martin Roesch: "Re: IDS: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers"
- Previous message: Brotschi, Brian: "IDS: RE: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers"
- Next in thread: Martin Roesch: "Re: IDS: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers"
- Reply: Martin Roesch: "Re: IDS: RE: Honey pots / decoy servers"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Aug 26 1999 - 02:50:17 CDT