OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Subject: IDS: comparison of NFR vs RealSecure
From: Thomas Nau (thomas.naurz.uni-ulm.de)
Date: Mon Mar 13 2000 - 01:20:28 CST

FAQ: See http://www.ticm.com/kb/faq/idsfaq.html
IDS: See http://www-rnks.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/~sobirey/ids.html
HELP: Having problems... email questions to ids-owneruow.edu.au
NOTE: Remove this section from reply msgs otherwise the msg will bounce.
SPAM: DO NOT send unsolicted mail to this list.
USUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe ids" to majordomouow.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

---
Will someone please offer a comparison of NFR vs RealSecure with focus on
the following topics (we run the usual switched 100-1000Mbit network but
sniffing will only be done in several 100 segments)

- speed
- update frequency and reliability of attack signature
- integration of FW-1 (means setup filter on the fly)
- multi-sensor single evaluation node environment
- available API (integrating own type of alerts, actions, ...)

- last but not least cost and administrative overhead

Thanks,
Thomas

====== PGP fingerprint B1 EE D2 39 2C 82 26 DA  A5 4D E0 50 35 75 9E ED ======

	Thought you got rid of all year 2k bugs and problems?
	Here's a new one: Windows 2000