|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?
From: Michael Stone (mstone
CS.LOYOLA.EDU)Date: Fri Mar 17 2000 - 10:25:35 CST
- Next message: David Brumley: "Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?"
- Previous message: Stuart Staniford-Chen: "Port 27960"
- In reply to: CL: Nelson, Jeff: "Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?"
- Next in thread: Hal Lockhart: "Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?"
- Reply: Michael Stone: "Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 12:41:13PM -0500, CL: Nelson, Jeff wrote:
> I have contacted the FBI regarding several issues. Some of those issues were
> scans from foreign countries not necessarily friendly to the U.S. We have
> one case pending with them for prosecution (stateside). Seth is correct. The
> FBI will not pursue a case if there is not a specific minimum dollar amount
> associated with the loss. The last I heard from them on this (over 1 year
> ago) that amount was $25,000. Our loss, per the FBI, is tallied based upon
> time and materials used to stop the attack and to repair. I calculated our
> loss for the case we have pending to be less than $15,000. I am expecting
> the agents in charge of this case to tell me they will not be able to go
> further.
How much taxpayer money should be spent on investigating a case that
won't go anywhere?
-- Mike Stone
- Next message: David Brumley: "Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?"
- Previous message: Stuart Staniford-Chen: "Port 27960"
- In reply to: CL: Nelson, Jeff: "Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?"
- Next in thread: Hal Lockhart: "Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?"
- Reply: Michael Stone: "Re: Cracked; rootkit - entrapment question?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]