|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: Rooted through in.identd on Red Hat 6.0
From: jms (sec
ORGONE.NEGATION.NET)Date: Fri Apr 21 2000 - 16:30:07 CDT
- Next message: Patrick Oonk: "BIND 8.2.2.-P3, 0-day exploit"
- Previous message: horio shoichi: "Re: Port 137 scans on the rise"
- In reply to: Del Elson: "Re: Rooted through in.identd on Red Hat 6.0"
- Next in thread: Erich Meier: "Re: Rooted through in.identd on Red Hat 6.0"
- Reply: jms: "Re: Rooted through in.identd on Red Hat 6.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Del Elson wrote:
> J.J. Horner wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> A client was hacked last week by what looked like a
> buffer
> >> overflow through in.identd. This was on a Red Hat 6.0
> >> box.
> >>
> >> RH don't have any current security notices or fixes for
> >> in.identd on their servers, and I haven't seen other
> >> boxes hacked through in.identd recently.
> >>
>
> > Well, he could have gotten in somewhere else and just put
> > the backdoor in
> > identd. I've had people get in on nameservers with old
> versions of BIND,
> > then backdoor another service.
>
> > Jon
>
> This is the most likely suggestion I've seen to date.
> I didn't have access to the box before the hack (otherwise
> I would have darn well patched it) but it's conceivable
> that it got rooted ages ago and the most recent attack
> was through a previous backdoor put into inetd or
> identd.
>
> It wasn't running BIND (note to all of the dozen or so
> people who e-mailed me dead certain that it was ... it's
> rather hard to use the ADMROCKS worm to get in to BIND
> on a machine that it's not even installed on, let alone
> running on ... I deleted a pile of mail on this without
> replying, not my usual style, but then there has been a
> flood of junk on this topic). It wasn't running FTPD,
> it wasn't running anything else with open ports.
>
> I don't know what else to suspect. It's conceivable that
> a trojan inetd/identd had been on the system for some time.
>
> Del
>
of course, if the user ssh's in from a compromised box, he has probably
given up local access via trojaned ssh binary.
-jason storm
jms
negation.net
/* hard work never killed noboby,
but i aint takin no chances. */
- Next message: Patrick Oonk: "BIND 8.2.2.-P3, 0-day exploit"
- Previous message: horio shoichi: "Re: Port 137 scans on the rise"
- In reply to: Del Elson: "Re: Rooted through in.identd on Red Hat 6.0"
- Next in thread: Erich Meier: "Re: Rooted through in.identd on Red Hat 6.0"
- Reply: jms: "Re: Rooted through in.identd on Red Hat 6.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]