|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: tin.it and others non collaborative isps.
From: Osvaldo Janeri Filho (osvaldojaneri
UOL.COM.BR)Date: Fri Jul 07 2000 - 17:02:19 CDT
- Next message: David Knaack: "Re: WuFTP exploit?"
- Previous message: Dan Hollis: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- In reply to: Forrester, Mike: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Next in thread: Philipp Buehler: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Next in thread: Brooke, O'Neil: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Reply: Osvaldo Janeri Filho: "tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Reply: Philipp Buehler: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Reply: gabriel rosenkoetter: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Reply: Bradley Woodward: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Reply: Richard Bejtlich: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
IMHO it's a good idea if we unite and block ips from ISP's like
tin.it. They will collaborate as soon as their clients start to complain
that they can't access some address. What about a page that contains all
the IPs that we must block and the reasons for that?
--Osvaldo Janeri Filho Internet Consultant E-Security, E-Commerce, E-solutions Fortaleza,CE - Brasil
*************************************************************************** Email : osvaldojaneri
uol.com.br Tel: +55 (0xx85) 9181-8528 GnuPG KEY http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE88C7991
***************************************************************************
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Forrester, Mike wrote:
> According to ripe.net, they own 212.216.0.0 - 212.216.255.255 so everyone > might want to block their whole range... > > While poking around, I found several references to interbusiness.it as shown > near the end. > > BTW - Does anyone know of a site that lists known 'rogue' ISP's and why they > are considered such? > > Mike Forrester - Systems Security Engineer > High Speed Access Corp. - Denver, CO USA > mforrester
hsacorp.net - +1 303 256 2134 > > .................cut............................
- Next message: David Knaack: "Re: WuFTP exploit?"
- Previous message: Dan Hollis: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- In reply to: Forrester, Mike: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Next in thread: Philipp Buehler: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Next in thread: Brooke, O'Neil: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Reply: Osvaldo Janeri Filho: "tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Reply: Philipp Buehler: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Reply: gabriel rosenkoetter: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Reply: Bradley Woodward: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Reply: Richard Bejtlich: "Re: tin.it and others non collaborative isps."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]