|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
Subject: Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP
From: Talisker (Talisker
NETWORKINTRUSION.CO.UK)Date: Mon Jul 10 2000 - 04:54:53 CDT
- Next message: Martin Macok: "Ehm... what? (Re: Simultaneous Attacks)"
- Previous message: Pauel Loshkin: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- In reply to: Dan Hollis: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Next in thread: Dan Hollis: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Reply: Talisker: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Hollis" <goemon
SASAMI.ANIME.NET>
To: <INCIDENTS
securityfocus.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP
> Now that I think about it, are there any RBL-type BGP services for known
> rogue networks? Eg networks which originate attacks and refuse to take any
> action? If so I submit 212.216.184.0 - 212.216.191.255 as the first
> netblock to be blackholed.
>
> -Dan
>
I could be tempted into maintaining such a list, my concerns are:
Does such a list exist already and if so, where is it?
Denial of Service, the scope for DOS is extreme therefore each submitted
range would need to be verified with the guilty ISP to test their response.
This will take time. A detailed mechanism of verification would need to be
built, perhaps a pending and a verified list. Any ideas?
Legal issues, if such a list was to prove popular, the business effect
on the blakholed ISPs may be terminal, leaving myself open to possible
prosecution. (oh well I've nothing to lose)
Does anyone else want to do it? because I'm already pretty busy with my IDS
site.
Andy
www.networkintrusion.co.uk
- Next message: Martin Macok: "Ehm... what? (Re: Simultaneous Attacks)"
- Previous message: Pauel Loshkin: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- In reply to: Dan Hollis: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Next in thread: Dan Hollis: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Reply: Talisker: "Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]