OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Ignacio Machin (imachinCI.CL)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 09:07:19 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    I have also noted an increased in RPC scanning, yesterday were from:
    ftp.bses.tcc.edu.tw an RH 6.0 on a i586 kernel 2.2.5
    medicina20.bio.um.es an RH 6.2 (Zoot) Kernel 2.2.14-5.0 on an i586
    205.218.251.7 Red Hat 6.2 (Zoot) Kernel 2.2.14-5.0smp on a 2-processor i686
    216.82.71.6 Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux) PHP/3.0.15 mod_perl/1.21
    on Linux (obtained with netcraft )
     211.62.38.22 RH 6.2 (Zoot) Kernel 2.2.14-5.0 on an i686

    So after this I notices something:

    ALL of then are RH boxes all of then seems to have weak protection or none
    cause I could connect to ports 23, 21 25 in almost all of them ( except
    216.82.71.6 )

    Going now to check if there is some bug on those systems regarding the RPC,
    also to note is that the above reports are from a NT box so the "thing" has
    not OS detection system.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Nathan W. Lindstrom" <nlindstromENSIM.COM>
    To: <INCIDENTSSECURITYFOCUS.COM>
    Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:25 PM
    Subject: Re: anyone else seen an increase in sunrpc scans these days?

    > I strongly recommend downloading, building and running PortSentry from
    > http://www.psionic.com/abacus/portsentry/
    >
    > I have run it with great success on FreeBSD, Linux and Solaris.
    >
    > --Nathan
    >
    >
    >
    > Digital Overdrive wrote:
    > >
    > > [requoted]
    > >
    > > Cristian Dumitrescu wrote:
    > > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Alex Popa wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > In the last five days, the port scans to my entire class C have
    dramatically
    > > > > increased, from one per two days on average, to four yesterday and
    six today.
    > > > >
    > > > > Is there a new exploit around, or is there some sort of new worm out
    there?
    > > > >
    > > > > I might just be paranoid, but here are the addreses that have been
    looking
    > > > > for port 111 in the last 26 hours:
    > > > >
    > > > > 24.26.121.156
    > > > > 24.168.66.119
    > > > > 64.31.226.156
    > > > > 142.169.227.102
    > > > > 193.226.15.15
    > > > > 211.218.144.11
    > > >
    > > > Hey
    > > > I've been experiencing the same kind of scans in the last 2 weeks,
    with
    > > > increased density in the last days, from these ip addreses:
    > > >
    > > > 211.120.63.136
    > > > 213.154.132.122
    > > > 210.205.6.215
    > > > 24.114.48.24
    > > > 62.83.125.82
    > > > 193.231.199.4
    > > > 193.40.223.66
    > > > 65.3.3.83
    > > > 193.230.227.234
    > >
    > > Just one question: How do you detect these scans ?
    > > I can't find anything in my logs, but I don't have programs like
    > > portsentry running. What can you (all) advice me ?
    > >
    > > Kind regards,
    > >
    > > Jan
    > >
    > > --
    > > .~. Dutch Security Information Network : http://www.dsinet.org
    > > /V\ news:alt.hack.nl FAQ : http://www.dsinet.org/hackfaq
    > > /( )\ digioverdsinet.org / digiovercotse.com
    > > ^^-^^ "Microsoft: We make virii work!"
    >
    > --
    >
    >
    > [Your mouse moved. Windows NT will be restarted for your changes to take
    effect.]