|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Etienne Joubert (etienne
citec.net)Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 01:03:09 CST
>>On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 05:35, TCG CSIRT wrote:
>> Has anyone seen evidence of a worm?
>no, but then we have not had any compromises. I have seen no random
probing
>that is favoured by most worms. I do believe that there are worms out
there
>that exploit BIND problems, I regularly see random probes on udp 53.
I left one of our machines open, it got comprimised and was running vuln
checks and
attempts on addresses specified in a txt file. A lot of binaries were
replaced except for `find`.
From this I could work my way through the cleanup process and see everything
was going on..
Not surprizing there was a backdoor shell through which the silent intruder
started the daemons to scan/attack
other addresses.
I'm sure it's easy enough for them to simply automate this process and bam,
you got a worm.
PS: Our log counters are sitting at just over 4000 since 1 Feb.
regards,
EJ
CiTEC.NET
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]