OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Eric Brandwine (ericbUU.NET)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 17:21:33 CST

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    >>>>> "fj" == Filip Jonckers <fjonckersInterconnect.be> writes:

    Having the service installed and having it running are two different
    things.

    fj> A lot of server installations NEED snmp service installed...

    fj> let me give an example:

    fj> Compaq Proliant servers installed with NT/win2K should be
    fj> running Compaq Insight Agents which are software agents
    fj> to monitor/manage the Compaq hardware
    fj> Compaq Insight Manager software is used to poll
    fj> the status of the agents (using SNMP and some other ports)

    fj> problems with hard disk, memory, backplane, temperature ....
    fj> can be seen before the major crash happens

    These should all be traps. Sending a trap is always safe. You might
    want to take a good look at your trap host, but your clients are OK.

    fj> Stuff like this are vital in an environment with dozens of Proliant
    fj> servers installed

    We've got thousands of deployed servers. We're scared.

    fj> the same for unix or other environments ....

    UNIX mostly. We're taking a good close look at our trap hosts, and
    for some large commercial packages, we're implementing a trap proxy
    based on the latest (non-vulnerable) UCD-SNMP package. It's not a lot
    of code, and will protect the things we cannot upgrade or patch.

    There is no NEED. You need to do business and make money more than
    you need SNMP. Evaluate what SNMP means to you (and seperate out
    polling vs. trapping), and determine what the consequences are of
    losing either or both. Your network will not stop dead if you turn
    off SNMP, it just won't run as smoothly. You'll have to work harder,
    and outages (if any) will be more severe.

    Also, I don't recall the results of our Windoze testing, but I believe
    that most versions are only vulnerable if the attacker knows the
    community string. Don't trust me on that, verify it for yourself, but
    if so, go change your strings now. That'll help out. If you're using
    public/private, you've got problems.

    ericb

    -- 
    Eric Brandwine     |  Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to
    UUNetwork Security |  speak out and remove all doubt.
    ericbuu.net       |
    +1 703 886 6038    |      - Silvan Engel
    Key fingerprint = 3A39 2C2F D5A0 FC7C  5F60 4118 A84A BD5D  59D7 4E3E
    

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com