From: Jeff (spam-fighterbigfoot.com)
Date: Sat May 17 2003 - 17:12:59 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Justin Coffi" <jcoffihotmail.com> posted to incidentssecurityfocus.com on
Sat, 17 May 2003 at 10:35:08 -0700:
> What information supplied by google suggested that?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Theall [mailto:thealltifaware.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 9:49 AM
> To: incidentssecurityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: Scans from proxyprotector.com
8<
> Googling news for proxyprotector as well as 64.201.104.2 (the host they
> seem to scan from) suggests they're black hats.
8<

The article at
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=slrnbbf3m8.1djf.andrew%2Bnonews%40trinity.supernews.net
posted by Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonewssupernews.com> to
news.admin.net-abuse.email on Tue, 06 May 2003 at 10:30:32 -0000 states "my
guess is that they are black-hat."

Best Regards, Jeff.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Wireless LAN Policies for Security & Management - NEW White Paper ***
Just like wired networks, wireless LANs require network security policies
that are enforced to protect WLANs from known vulnerabilities and threats.
Learn to design, implement and enforce WLAN security policies to lockdown enterprise WLANs.

To get your FREE white paper visit us at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/AirDefense-incidents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]