From: InfoSec News (isnc4i.org)
Date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 05:18:54 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Forwarded from: Jason Coombs <jasoncscience.org>
Cc: paulrobichaux.net;, Dan_Vertoncomputerworld.com;,
   rfornoinfowarrior.org;, full-disclosurelists.netsys.com

InfoSec News wrote:
> Forwarded from: Paul Robichaux <paulrobichaux.net>
> 1. Geer claimed to be speaking for stake. He wasn't.

I do hope that all of you actually read the report before forming any
opinions about it, the people who wrote it, or the manner in which
those people portrayed themselves as authors of it. It is simply
impossible to interpret Geer's role in authoring this report as
anything close to "speaking for Stake" -- it was clearly the
"speaking" part that got him canned, and one need not be paranoid in
order to see Microsoft's direct or indirect influence in the growing
"punishment for speech" phenomenon within the United States. Stake's
own political bias in advancing the so-called "responsible disclosure"
process is a crucial element of criminalizing speech... We can't put
speakers in prison unless we can prove that they violated the rules
with their speech, so Stake is busy trying to define the rules.

The whole business makes me feel sick. What we really need is freedom,
and the ability to defend ourselves adequately from anyone who might
choose to exercise theirs in a way that doesn't conform to other
people's arbitrary definition of "responsible". There was a time in
the past when there was little doubt that we had freedom.

Freedom must be one of the costs of monopoly.

CyberInsecurity: The Cost of Monopoly
How the Dominance of Microsoft's Products Poses a Risk to Security
http://www.ccianet.org/papers/cyberinsecurity.pdf

Sincerely,

Jason Coombs
jasoncscience.org

-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org

To unsubscribe email majordomoattrition.org with 'unsubscribe isn'
in the BODY of the mail.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]