From: InfoSec News (isnc4i.org)
Date: Tue Oct 21 2003 - 05:11:37 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Forwarded from: William Knowles <wkc4i.org>

http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2003/1020/pol-cyber-10-20-03.asp

By Diane Frank
Oct. 20, 2003

The leaders responsible for the nation's critical infrastructures must
create rules for working together in the event of a crisis, according
to a presidential advisory group.

Those rules will be the first step in avoiding a calamitous
domino-like crash of succeeding infrastructures if there is a unified
attack, private-sector leaders concluded in a set of proposed
recommendations for the Bush administration.

The National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC), made up of 30
high-level executives from the private sector, is developing
recommendations for President Bush and the Homeland Security
Department. The group will make a wide range of recommendations,
covering everything from how to disclose software vulnerabilities to
where government regulation can enhance security.

The council includes representatives from every sector, but the group
called on expertise from organizations at DHS, the FBI, national labs
and several sector-specific organizations, such as the National Energy
Resource Council and the financial services' Banking Industry
Technology Secretariat, a technology consortium of the nation's
largest banks, to develop the recommendations.

The goal of NIAC's recommendations is to alleviate the risks of any
disruptions in infrastructures, which include everything from power
companies to telecommunications networks.

The power of the potential failures was demonstrated this summer when
a widespread power blackout spread over the Northeast and when a
string of worms and viruses clogged Internet connections.

Incidents can have widespread, unanticipated effects, said council
chairman Richard Davidson, chairman and chief executive officer of
Union Pacific Corp.

The council's first set of recommendations will go to the White House
soon. Others will be ready early next year.

The work that has already been done will be extremely helpful for the
Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection Directorate at DHS,
said Robert Liscouski, assistant secretary of the infrastructure
protection office.

"The working group has identified a lot of the things that we've
identified as we're rolling out," he said.

The nine proposed recommendations, presented by the Working Group on
Cross Sector Interdependencies and Risk Assessment Guidance at the
quarterly NIAC meeting last week, have several short-term and
long-term action items.

Consistency across sectors is a common theme running throughout the
recommendations.

A critical step is for leaders of the critical infrastructures to name
a coordinator, the group said. The coordinator must be a full-time
position, "given the importance of this role and the magnitude of this
role," said Susan Vismor, senior vice president of strategic
technology at Mellon Financial Corp. and co-chairwoman of the working
group.

The proposed recommendations focus on the policy, coordination and
management aspects of problem prevention and incident response,
because modeling interdependencies is a multiyear and
multimillion-dollar process, Vismor said.

Once the recommendations are implemented, the working group plans to
report back to NIAC through a score card that measures progress on
each item.

The council also heard updates from working groups that are developing
a common vulnerability reporting methodology, attempting to improve
the implementation and use of information sharing and analysis centers
in every sector, and looking at the potential role of government
regulation in private-sector infrastructure security.

Experts have discussed the need for common reporting metrics. The
shrinking cycle between a vulnerability's discovery and an attacker's
exploitation — the Blaster worm this summer had a cycle time of less
than a month — proves the need for immediate action, said John
Chambers, vice chairman of NIAC and chairman of the vulnerability
disclosure working group.

The working group's recommendations will go to the president in
January, but during the next four to six months, experts will develop
a common way to categorize vulnerabilities, because even organizations
within a single sector can't seem to agree on this issue. "A common
scoring method…will underpin the rest of the vulnerability disclosure
guidelines," Chambers said.

DHS officials are anxious to get the recommendations from the
information sharing and analysis center enhancement working group,
because that is a situation that the department is trying to address,
Liscouski said.

To determine how government regulation could assist in raising the
level of infrastructure security, the working group's recommendations
are "going to be extremely valuable to us," Liscouski said.

"This is probably one of the more critical areas that we're looking
at" because of all the attention from industry, Congress and agencies,
he said.

Responding to a direct request from President Bush in July, members
also formed two new working groups to examine how to rank sectors'
vulnerability to cyberattacks and determine how best to increase the
overall security of the Internet.

***

Nine steps to better security

The United States should take nine steps to improve the security of
critical infrastructures, according to a working group of the National
Infrastructure Advisory Council.

* Create similar reporting structures across the various critical
  infrastructure sectors, such as energy and telecommunications.

* Better define and publicize the role of sector coordinators.

* Develop and test crisis management plans in each sector and across
  sectors.

* Create a cross-sector virtual command center to coordinate
  interaction with the private sector during crises.

* Take advantage of government-sponsored exercises to devise and test
  response plans.

* Enhance public awareness of the nation's dependency on the Internet
  and promote development of higher-quality software.

* Establish consistent coordination among public and private emergency
  management organizations.

* Find ways to defray the financial burden of securing critical
  infrastructures.

* Build on simulation and modeling technology created in national
  laboratories to conduct infrastructure research.

 
*==============================================================*
"Communications without intelligence is noise; Intelligence
without communications is irrelevant." Gen Alfred. M. Gray, USMC
----------------------------------------------------------------
C4I.org - Computer Security, & Intelligence - http://www.c4i.org
================================================================
Help C4I.org with a donation: http://www.c4i.org/contribute.html
*==============================================================*

-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org

To unsubscribe email majordomoattrition.org with 'unsubscribe isn'
in the BODY of the mail.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]