|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
[ISN] Bagle e-mail virus slows, fuels naming debate
From: William Knowles (wk
c4i.org)
Date: Thu Jan 22 2004 - 02:40:42 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,89264,00.html
[I've said it privately that one way to stomp out Windows viruses is
to stop giving them cutesy names, I really wish someone would name the
next Windows virus "Big Red Penis". I would think one virus outbreak
with Dan Rather or Peter Jennings having to start out the national
news talking about the Big Red Penis virus infecting Windows computers
worldwide would be enough to get Redmond to take some real action in
stopping future outbreaks. - WK]
Story by Bernhard Warner
JANUARY 21, 2004
REUTERS
Antivirus technicians said today that Bagle, the latest e-mail virus
to hit global computer users, is in decline and no longer considered a
major threat. But as the contagion runs its course, some antivirus
technicians are asking whether there's a better way of naming such
viruses to alert the public.
Since emerging on Sunday (see story) [1], Bagle has been something of
a mystery. Computer security experts first called it "Beagle" after
pulling the reference from a line of code found in the malicious
program.
Later, it was given the name Bagle, a misspelled version of the
doughnut-shaped roll. Warnings about a malicious bagel drew more
questions than normal from the virus-weary public.
"Personally, I would have called it Beagle rather than Bagle, for the
sole purpose of avoiding all these support calls asking, 'Why did you
call it bagle?' " said Graham Cluley, a senior technology consultant
at Sophos PLC, a U.K.-based software firm specializing in virus and
spam detection.
Agreeing on a single, easily identifiable name is a crucial step in
the virus alert process. Quickly publicizing the existence of a new
outbreak and developing a prescribed fix are vital to stopping worms
and viruses in their tracks.
Despite the technical expertise that goes into identifying an outbreak
and a remedy, the process of naming a virus is hardly scientific. In
the past, digital viruses and worms have been named after favorite
lunch dishes or friends, or plucked from the words or phrases found in
the code by antivirus technicians. Sometimes the words are jumbled, as
with Nimda, which is admin spelled backwards.
As a result, computer users have been urged to brace themselves
against such notorious contagions as Slammer and Goner. And they have
been advised not to be fooled by the infamous Love Bug or click on
Anna Kournikova.
With hundreds of new outbreaks emerging each month, new monikers are
in short supply, experts said.
For this reason, some have suggested that antivirus firms devise a
naming procedure like national weather services, which have agreed on
a long alphabetical list of names for hurricanes years before they
form. "What I would like to see is everybody using the same naming
scheme," said Alex Shipp, senior antivirus technologist at MessageLabs
Ltd., a U.K.-based e-mail virus detection firm.
"It's confusing if you think your antivirus software has you protected
against one virus and then you hear on the radio it's called something
else," Shipp said.
But getting virus technicians to agree is no small feat. "I'm afraid
it's never going to happen," Cluley said. "These virus outbreaks
travel around the world in minutes. If you have a hurricane coming at
you, you have a few hours to agree."
[1] http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,89222,00.html
-
ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org
To unsubscribe email majordomo
attrition.org with 'unsubscribe isn'
in the BODY of the mail.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]