From: InfoSec News (isnc4i.org)
Date: Sat Oct 09 2004 - 04:09:25 CDT

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Forwarded from: Dave Close <davecompata.com>

InfoSec News wrote:
>By Jon Oltsik
>What's needed is a simple home security service with two dominant
>features:

If such security can be provided by a black box at the consumer end,
then why can't it also be provided by a black box at the ISP end? The
cost should be even lower due to scale, and the reliability should be
higher due to active management.

I think the real problem is that this author hasn't bothered to define
"security". Implicitly, he seems to mean that bandwidth won't be
choked by viruses and spam. Of course, in itself that does nothing to
protect a home network. And so long as bandwidth is not metered, the
home user has no incentive to help. --

       Dave Close, Compata, Costa Mesa CA +1 714 434 7359
       davecompata.com dhclosealumni.caltech.edu
      "It will take more than an Act of Congress to persuade me
       that women and men are the same." - Oliver Wendell Holmes

_________________________________________
Open Source Vulnerability Database (OSVDB) Everything is Vulnerable - http://www.osvdb.org/

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]