OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
Subject: Re: RealSecure NT vs Solaris
From: Jason Axley (jason.axleyattws.com)
Date: Fri Jul 07 2000 - 17:19:11 CDT

TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
majordomoiss.net Contact issforum-owneriss.net for help with any problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

RealSecure on NT simply could not handle the load of the busy network we
had it on. Memory leaks abounded. Solaris is _much_ better, although
we've been dealing with some RS bugs that seem to be fixed now. Also,
IMO, Solaris can be reliably locked down much better than NT and is much
more easily managed remotely (and securely). SSHd and RealSecure
servers--try that on NT.

-Jason

On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Arie Elkins wrote:

> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:27:45 -0400
> From: Arie Elkins <elkinsathenasecurity.com>
> To: issforumiss.net
> Subject: RealSecure NT vs Solaris
>
>
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
> majordomoiss.net Contact issforum-owneriss.net for help with any problems!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hello,
> I just have a quick question reguarding RealSecure. Are there any
> differences whatsoever between the RealSecure Engine on NT and on Solaris?
> I ask this because we often integrate a RealSecure solution for our clients,
> and sometimes they ask what the difference is. Other times they just assume
> that solaris is better becuase it's not NT. Anything you all can give me
> would be much appreciated. Thank you.
>
> Arie Elkins
> The Athena Group
>
>
>
> 

-- 

AT&T Wireless Services
IT Security
UNIX Security Operations Specialist