OSEC

Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com
 
From: Haradon, Dorita (ISSAtlanta) (DHaradon_at_iss.net)
Date: Wed Jul 31 2002 - 14:01:09 CDT

  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
    majordomoiss.net Contact issforum-owneriss.net for help with any problems!
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Check out this whitepaper on RPC Signature Quality. It describes how Snort
    rules detect RPC exploits vs. how RealSecure does. Snort was also included
    in the latest round of IDS performance testing conducted by NSS.

    http://documents.iss.net/whitepapers/RPC_Sig_Quality.pdf

    *******************************************
    Dorita Haradon (dharadoniss.net)
    Technical Marketing Manager
    Internet Security Systems (NASDAQ: ISSX)
    6303 Barfield Road, Building B, 4th Floor
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328
    Office: 404-236-2856 Mobile: 770-598-2502
    http://www.iss.net - The Power to Protect
    ISS Press Releases:
    http://bvlive01.iss.net/issEn/delivery/prlist.jsp
    ********************************************

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Simon Desmeules [mailto:SimonDesmeules.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:34 PM
    To: Bennett Todd
    Cc: counter.spygmx.de; Haradon, Dorita (ISSAtlanta); issforumiss.net;
    manuelorion.cl; RobertHuberfirstusa.com
    Subject: Re: FW: comparison Dragon - Real Secure

    Good stuff, have you received any technical documents that compare Real
    Secure vs Snort? If so, I`d like to take a look at it.

    thanks,
    Simon. :-)

    Bennett Todd wrote:

    >I hate to disagree, but I think the response was all that could be
    >hoped for. If you want any hope of a balanced, neutral comparison,
    >light on marketing, you ask for it in a neutral forum; in this case
    >focus-ids would be a good place. If you ask for a comparison on a
    >vendor's list, it's reasonable to expect the marketing material that
    >the vendor has on hand to help people feel good about picking their
    >product over the competition.
    >
    >This material isn't useless; it's what you retain after you finish
    >the vendor selection process, to hand to anybody who comes along
    >later questioning your choice. It's not what you want for initial
    >product selection, but it's the reasonable response to expect when
    >you ask a vendor for a comparison.
    >
    >-Bennett
    >