|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Oliver Falk (oliver
linux-kernel.at)
Date: Wed Nov 14 2007 - 14:52:30 CST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi!
Can someone explain me, why we have different define's for WRLCK and
RDLCK within alpha kernel headers:
Alpha system:
asm/fcntl.h:#define F_RDLCK 1
asm-generic/fcntl.h:#ifndef F_RDLCK
asm-generic/fcntl.h:#define F_RDLCK 0
bits/fcntl.h:#define F_RDLCK 1 /* Read lock. */
Intel system:
asm-generic/fcntl.h:#ifndef F_RDLCK
asm-generic/fcntl.h:#define F_RDLCK 0
bits/fcntl.h:#define F_RDLCK 0 /* Read lock. */
I would say F_RDLCK should better be 0 as in i386, but I also guess that
changing this would break many things, wouldn't it?
I don't want to tell you my (long) story, how I found that and why I was
searching for it :-(
(Jay, you know what I'm talkin' about, don't you?)
Well, maybe my kernel headers are just packaged up like crap!?
Best,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
axp-list mailing list
axp-list
redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]