From: Marc Schlensog (mschlensredhat.com)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2008 - 08:26:23 CST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:18:23 +0100
Oliver Falk <oliverlinux-kernel.at> wrote:

> Matt Turner wrote:
> > Oliver,
> >
> >> Jay. Since we don't support < EV5, would it be save to use those
> >> instead?
> >
> > BWX appeared in the EV56, and MVI appeared in PCA56 (the generation
> > after EV56). So the real question is: do you want to support >EV5,
> > EV56, or >PCA56. Obviously >PCA56 is the easiest, plus, who still
> > uses a plain EV5?
>
> Oh. Right... /me was wrong :-(
>
> Well, I need at least EV56 compatibility (because of my AS4100 and
> AS1000(A))...
>
> I don't know what other users are running... But I'd guess >= EV56.
>
> Guys, what do you think would happen if a binary compiled with
> BXW/MVI would run on < EV56?

Don't know... does gcc support something like Compaq's -march/-mtune?

b.r.,

Marc

_______________________________________________
axp-list mailing list
axp-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]