|
Neohapsis is currently accepting applications for employment. For more information, please visit our website www.neohapsis.com or email hr@neohapsis.com |
From: Joey Hess (joeyh_at_debian.org)
Date: Wed Oct 02 2002 - 23:58:57 CDT
WebMaster wrote:
> > > (pureftpd is more secure than proftpd)
>
> it s because we can read on pureftpd.org:
>
> "the number of root exploits found since the very first released
> version is zero"
>
> we can t read things like that on postfix.org and proftpd.org
You definitly need to check out vsftpd then. It's got "very secure" it
it's _name_, so it must be secure!
-- see shy jo, who finds it a find and well-designed ftp server nontheless
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9m86R3xwsXJZQhyMRApaoAKCs518PepkaK1SiFtTN4dL2dMGWFQCfeklB ECetNpDulHvR5IC9K7G/xG4= =DbuP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requestlists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster
lists.debian.org
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster